B
british_hempire
Guest
the point i was trying to make is there is much confusion with the name indica. When Washington and the pharmacopoeia's are referring to Cannabis Indica *ahem* *ahem* they are talking about Shanti's Indian side of the widow.![]()
But are they? The northern part of India, which includes modern-day Pakistan is full of indica, the valleys of northern Pakistan like Swat are home to strains very similar to those found the other side of the border in Afghanistan, what we in the west would call a Kush type. They were definitely aware of the differences between the broadleafed hash cultivars of the north and the narrowleaved ganja cultivars of the south, what exact nomenclature they used I don't know, I suspect they called anything from India 'Indica' so they could be referring to a Keralan sativa or a Pakistani indica, I suspect the latter as it's not like they didn't study the different types and their effects, O'Shaughnessy studied it in the 1840s and the Brits did plenty of more studies after that in India.
