D
Donald Mallard
Guest
Rick your back i see so is your theoretical text book answers plucked from corn peas and any other botanical plant you see fit to use to describe cannabis.
First off rick lets talk about wild cannabis be it sativas used for hemp in the 1700s like sativas found in India that would get you high unlike hemp of today rick.
There were in fact a few areas were man planted cannabis and it went wild on the Nepean river then we have the famous crop at Newcastle that the hippies would go harvest and one not to far from Brisbane all from the first fleet settlers in australia rick and from what i read they were not Monoceous or as most people call them rick hermaphrodites.
There are areas in African still were theres wild cannabis and other areas around the world be it a few now napal has it growing every were is that hemp rick ? India is that hemp to rick ?.
Artificial selection ha rick like you can breed better than nature can shes been at it for longer than all of us put together rick its od you say this yet feel mans manipulation of species like cannabis like feminisation is perfectly fine.
Maybe the hemp your talking about is in fact GHS fem seeds left to villages after they took there best seed stock and the farmers left them growing as they relised just how bad there fem seeds were and that would explane the Monoceous or as most people call them rick hermaphrodites.
You guys need to spend more time growing i think and less time reading about plant breeding involving peas corn and wheat.
hi mr hempy ,, see your at it again ,,,
just one thing id like to know about nature breeding drug type cannabis for us ,,, (we are lucky)
is what purpose would nature have to increase the potency of cannabis??
Im sure youll find its man that wants it stronger , nature couldnt give a hoot..