Breeding techniques

Or in other words, the park ranger approach preserves what is there already and uses open pollination among as many plants as can be reasonably used.
The developers approach uses as few parents as he is comfortable with, (for some 2 for some 1), in order to reduce variation within the offspring at the risk of also reducing health. Thats where the skill (and dilligance (and luck)) of the breeder comes into play in selecting suitable parents.
 
I am a scientist and I am passionate. What about you GITT, you seem like a pretty passionate guy to me, sometimes to a fault.

But I don't see the contextual veracity of your analogy, we are breeders discussing the importance of various components of breeding, in a thread titled "breeding techniques".

By Burbank being a biologist does that not class him as a scientist? or perhaps ecologist would be better suited..
biologists study organisms and their relationship to their environment

Plant Breeding Giants: Burbank, the Artist; Vavilov, the Scientist -- Crow 158 (4): 1391 -- Genetics

either way I do not why you NEED to be a scientist to breed, you just need to have an understanding IMO. but what will teach you more? Burbanks book or a plant breeding book ?
 
In my opinion it is those who are trying to explain everything they encounter by the only mean of science, who miss important things and see through the small end of the telescope.

Free your mind... and your ass will follow.

Peace.

K.
 
hmmm, its looking through the small end of a telescope that allows us to see further.

"Voir les choses par le petit bout de la lorgnette" is a french expression which means to have a narrow outlook; to take a narrow view of things.

When you look with a telescope you see far way but you only see a small portion of the total landscape.

Peace.

K.
 
Will Fractals Revolutionize Physics, Biology and Other Sciences?

I`m a big fan of Benoit Mandelbrot r.i.p. and i do think outside the box and also think that we have alot yet to learn time will tell i suppose.

I defo dont beleive a 2 thousand year old book that dictates the state of the world we live in where a peaceful man can change into a monster through religious extremeism

I bet my epilepsy is an aquired bad trait instead of genetical inheritance;
 
There is not only in France that french is spoken...lol

That said this is not far away from where I live.:)

Peace.

K.
 
I passed a lot of time in France though...

It is a great country...just don't like their current gouvernment.

I was at the Burning Spear concert I posted this morning in the Reggae Radio thread.:D

Peace.

K.
 
Your own experience will teach you more...

Peace.

K.

My experiences have made me look to science, were I found answers.. I didn't just plunder on having no clue why things do as they do... I don't believe in god, I don't believe I will see loved ones again once they are dead.. I believe in plant populations. I believe science has opened my eyes not narrowed them.. that said I have no degree in relation to plants, genes or otherwise... though I do have them for other things... I'm currently riddled with illness mumbo jumbo won't cure me nor doing 50 hail marys a day.. but science can make me live with the illnesses.
 
I think there are several ways to breed cannabis...

but I pretend that until now the best products came from the TSB/MNS camp.

Let's see what you can achieve in the future by following your method of breeding.

Peace.

K.
 
Last edited:
By Burbank being a biologist does that not class him as a scientist? or perhaps ecologist would be better suited..


Plant Breeding Giants: Burbank, the Artist; Vavilov, the Scientist -- Crow 158 (4): 1391 -- Genetics

either way I do not why you NEED to be a scientist to breed, you just need to have an understanding IMO. but what will teach you more? Burbanks book or a plant breeding book ?

Luther Burbank did receive an honorary degree late in life from Tufts in 1905, ScD I think, in Botanical Sciences, but he was a scientist long before this.
I would class him as a scientist, because he possessed a large amount of expert scientific knowledge, and because he utilized the scientific method, in a constant quest to obtain practical scientific knowledge, in order to create superior plants.

Certainly a book or two on breeding might be a good precursor to Burbank, or at least some practical working knowledge of breeding.
His books are more advanced, ie, if you don't already know how to breed, they may not teach you exactly how to breed, but if you already are a breeder, then they provide a huge wealth of information about a specific type of breeding, which would be Burbank's unique style of hybrid breeding.

As the most successful and prolific agricultural breeder in history, don't you think we might have something to gain from his teachings?

I believe his unique style of breeding is particularly relevent to our unique plant, and where we are historically with our plant.

I agree with you Unclepeter, you certainly don't need to be a scientist to breed. Breeding our unique plant is quite easy really, just don't kill the males, and you will get more seeds than you know what to do with. Of course typological breeding is a bit more complex than that, but not much. It certainly does not have to be as complicated as many would make it out to be.

Breeding with the scientific method is quite easy really, it takes a certain amount of diligence, a pen and a notebook, and a reliable way of labelling one's plants. Most indoor growers already have their "labs" all set up and ready to go. If they weren't able to maintain certain variables constant, they would never be successful at indoor growing in the first place.
 
I believe his unique style of breeding is particularly relevent to our unique plant, and where we are historically with our plant.

Well that depends where you think we are at with cannabis historically! I'd say for too long people have being things in a bad way! lets look at intersexual prevalence in so called populations! lets look at the fact cannabis is an outcrossing species yet many seem to breed it in an inbred style! how many populations are truly dioecious?
 
Back
Top