Hiya L33t...Amoril...hope all is well...
To be honest, cloning is about whatever works for you...I don't believe any two techniques will ever be entirely the same...
Smaller is better, Amoril...not that size matters...but it does!!!

Bigger clones take longer to root, and longer to get going in general...smaller clones root faster and actually outgrow larger clones taken at exactly the same time...it's true...
L33t...when I think green, I think soft, pliable, flexible, stem...I think nitrogen...and that is not what I want or look for when I clone. Just like "less is more" with watering and ferts, "later is better" for taking clones IMO...
Branches at or near the bottom of the plant are the oldest...they are packed full of carbohydrates, the stem is firm (wood) but not thick, and they will be pruned anyway if you're doing it right...just before flowering...
Because they receive very little light, they have an incredibly slow metabolism, making them ideal for cloning...when the clone goes from the bottom of the plant to flourescents, light/nutrient/water requirements will be roughly the same, easing the clones into the rooting process and limiting possible complications from stress...
Fastest growth is in veg. Plant growth actually slows in flowering while light requirements increase...hence the stretch. The metabolism of the plant changes accordingly...plant needs more P and K than N... my thinking is that it is easier/faster/better for a clone to not have to change it's own chemistry (veg vs flow) twice...certainly less stressful for sure...hope this makes sense...tell me what you think...jay
