L33t
Well-known member
british hempire,
As this is an issue that needs careful handling and like Shanti said many people have chosen sides.. since you posted about me and the way you wrote things suggested something that is not true I just wanted things to be clear.
I don't have any problem regarding the Dutch Parliament papers I had posted info about in the the past , I do not like inaccuracies so I just wanted it to be clear that I had not given Joe and Marco the Selezny name info is all because in your post it clearly seemed like that.So thank you for coming in and clearing things up and please excuse me for questioning your intentions.
Like I said all this is not really important as all this info is publicly available and has been a long time..but I saw a post that seemed to suggested something I didn't do and I wanted to clear things up , glad it is all clear now.
l33t
I'm sorry l33t, you're reading too much into what was just a slip of the tongue on my part. I was merely making reference to the Dutch Parliamentary papers, Jesse had already mentioned earlier in this thread that you had uncovered them so i thought it was okay to acknowledge that in public, i was giving credit where credit was due, sorry if any offence was caused. Also, I wasn't inferring anything regarding the Selezny name, I forget how I found it, you are correct that the first reference i saw was in Frank Bovenkerk's book.
As this is an issue that needs careful handling and like Shanti said many people have chosen sides.. since you posted about me and the way you wrote things suggested something that is not true I just wanted things to be clear.
I don't have any problem regarding the Dutch Parliament papers I had posted info about in the the past , I do not like inaccuracies so I just wanted it to be clear that I had not given Joe and Marco the Selezny name info is all because in your post it clearly seemed like that.So thank you for coming in and clearing things up and please excuse me for questioning your intentions.
Like I said all this is not really important as all this info is publicly available and has been a long time..but I saw a post that seemed to suggested something I didn't do and I wanted to clear things up , glad it is all clear now.
The reason you see so much negativity bh in such threads is because not many people have done any , let alone serious , research.Negativity aside after more people started getting interested and involved , like bigherb said a lot of unknown info came up to the surface and more and more questions got answered..so as long as people discuss like adults and people do their research beforehand , for me there is still hope that the real history of the genetics will be known and one day credit will be given where its due. Some people are interested in giving it a shot to try and help find the real story of haze for the sake of the history of the genetics which itself is an important part of the cannabis culture apart from growing information exchange and is one of the main reasons such canna boards exist. It would be nice to see you continue to participate but I can't blame anyone who decides to not get involved any further cause like you said the exposure to all the negativity can really be frustrating and is far from a good vibe..I guess thats part of the price to pay in such a case and of course its up to each one of us to decide how to proceed..I'm bored of it all now and like Shanti says, it isn't getting us anywhere. I lot interest when I realized the potential for negativity contained in all this and I just don't dig negativity, surely it is best to focus on the positive aspects of life and for me, in large part, that's my plants.
So sorry to all I offended and I think I've had enough of talking about this subject now.
l33t
Last edited: