G `day TH
Yep !
And Hempy sang from the hill top re Mango Haze . That wasn`t even the same as what`s sold .
Inscrutable is the word that springs to mind .
Thanks for sharin
EB .
I know you don't trust anything Hempy said EB, but if what he said was right, that the testers were different than the official release, and the difference was the male (sk hz A vs sk hz C) then that would explain a lot.
It would mean that both descriptions were correct.
I have seen Shanti distill and generalize a strain description to the point of meaningless gibberish, but I have only ever seen him outright lie about a line one time.
That was calling Mullum Madness a pure haze, not A or C.
Besides that though, he usually just avoids answering the question by feeding back a bunch of unintelligible gibberish when asked something he wants to keep to himself.
I used to think he had someone else here posting under his account who did not speak english as his first language that wound up answered a lot of those types of questions, and that the language barrier was why it was impossible to decipher.
Then I though, maybe Shanti has spent so much time in Spain and india and exotic locales that he doesn't even speak like an Aussie any more.
In the end though, I decided both of those theories were wrong, concluding that the reason he puts so much effort into not answering questions is because he is afraid competition will produce something with his genetics that outperforms his own work if they have a better idea of the pedigree.
I mean, why write a paragraph of nonsense that doesn't answer a simple direct question when a pedigree can be written in a single line like a mathematical equation?
If anyone else has a better theory, I'd love to hear it.
This is my 8th year reading and posting up here, and that's the best guess I've got.
