Good to know
@pleased420, this situation is a bit new for me and friends around when asked ... so I started to take this radical change of treatment very badly. Let's say it's an accumulation. Multiple emails not answered, i got an unique "push" contact when i've validated the auction counted twice by a bug of the website. They were asking details and the invoice, i explained it again, in sending again all the necessary. Next morning, my account wasn't anymore valid. My password was changed. The only feedback i got from this, was the generic "out of office until the 31th" ... adding an additional layer of bad feeling. I'm just happy for now to have tested the new deal with a single order, not with a three digits stack. Can't wait Monday, then.
For the next rounds, i will stay in perpetual. Maybe until the end of the year btw. I will increase the density of the grow a bit also, next week i will figure out if i launch a NL#5xHaze (green packaging with the chick) and a 15 years old homemade F1 seeds (ghanaian x zamal) aside. Or the Critical Mass ^^
Best vibes to you ;o)
Hey
@Uncle Jack , obviously you like to explore what mother nature have to say too ^^
Hell, to answer i need to write a wall of text. It's pretty condensate, you won my award of the day in changing my mind by my weakness : talking breeding.
I just got done a week ago pollinating all my females to a Nordle Male.
... I have two Neville's skunk's in the room that got fertilised
... my ASH selection
... Afghan Haze next to it
Damn it's what i call an interesting party. AfghSknk x (Haze x AfghSknk), AfghSknk x (AfghSknk x AfghHaze) and AfghSknk x AfghHaze.
Totally arbitrary (phenotypes make all the magic individually), i bet on the Nordle x Afghan Haze for the hunting season, or your last idea in date ^^
When you say dominance test do you mean what the male will express in the cross?
I've to clarify then, i was just throwing it quickly to share some vibes.
I'm from the church of single pairing only. I never use twice one specimen; it's not an advise of any type or a snake oil recipe but more a philosophy that fit my needs. Breeding is a time-hungry hobby, i prefer to maximize this time in what i can learn on each strain landing here. I'm not a seed collector, i generally order what i'm at the point to germinate or at max, what I've planned for the year but it's rare. This is for the context.
This BB female have a very specific expression. She have the shape of the dominant subgroup (tall, very stretchy, discreet minty scents) but she express it in a very recessive way (very close to the candied clove of the Bilbo's cut, if you know it this pheno of the CM). She have a kind of nanism too, but in fact is coming from a double ovary seed that i initially took for a "siamese". So i let this lady survive the way she can aside his male brother, to finally disover while i was culling the male that she was a totally independent specimen. So i keep her "for the science", i generally unselect all runts, mutants, variegated ... i don't like unpredictability, inbreeding is my main source of pleasure in this hobby.
If i know very well this strain (like the Critical Mass too), mapping a strain is a never ending mission. So when I found an exception that break the rules of detection of a known sub-group ... i generally make an F1 with another strain i know well to shuffle the cards and see how the genotype resist. It's one more thing than i can predict later, if i cross the path of this expression again. I synthesize but i'm sure you got it.
The shish is a strain i know well too and that i'm very happy to bring back in the space this year. Nostalgia stuff. So it's really a dominance test with this specific phenotype (the female). Litterally. But in a "one stone two birds" configuration, what i will see when these F1 will express the heterosis will help me to inbred the two lines actually. And eventually how to hybridize them later (not necessary together) when they will be stabilized for my taste, and that i need something off road to fill my blunts.
I always thought a certain percentage would throw to the mother or father and the rest would be a hybrid of the two, with the possibility of recessive genes showing up if lucky.
In fact, strictly 50% for both. It's possible to cheat this ancestral equilibrium, but using some advanced technics (selfing, ga3 etc ...)
So actually all the plants are perfect hybrids of the (p1) blend, if it's not the case you get generally a mutation as the most frequent expression, that is shuffling again the cards. But always in unpredictable ways ^^
The only difference (that is fascinating to explore) is what is triggered or staying latent in this initial blend. In a way, how the life is escaping this very restricted pair.
And good for us, cannabis like to escape his genetic's jail with patterns that can be recognized a long time after the initial cross ^^
For recessive gens, it's pretty hard to expose my opinion in a single sentence, and not in my native langage. I personally don't mix what say the inbred ratios and the true genetic dominance. The best example i've in mind to express that it's a trap to mix it, is the Northern Light. If you count on what say the inner balance of this line to make hybrids, you're in the sh1t to the neck.
Well, i see this equation as a multi-layered one.
Now what you're describing in your sentence is a typical mendelian law ^^
Anyway, that should be fun working through those seeds you just created.
Can't wait ^^ No matter what will say the F1's shapes, i'm sure i will get a genetic shock in terps.
update : long post without a plant is sad ... the dominant shape of the BB to illustrate :