Ganja Guru's Retrial Set for Next Week

Bonetwister

New member
Ganja Guru's Retrial Set for Next Week
Posted by CN Staff on May 10, 2007 at 20:57:38 PT
By Josh Richman, Staff Writer
Source: Daily Review

medical San Francisco, CA -- Denying a slew of defense motions, a federal judge set the stage Thursday for the marijuana-cultivation retrial of Oakland's "Guru of Ganja" Ed Rosenthal to begin next week.

Jurors will be selected Monday and opening statements will be given Tuesday, launching a trial lasting three to four weeks, U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer said.

Attorneys for Rosenthal and Assistant U.S. Attorney George Bevan sparred before Breyer for about two hours Thursday as each side argued for inclusion or exclusion of certain evidence.

When the dust cleared, Breyer had denied Rosenthal's motion to dismiss the case, noting the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals had remanded it to him for retrial and that's what he intends to provide.

And just as he had at Rosenthal's first trial, the judge again denied Rosenthal's motions to introduce evidence and testimony showing he'd grown marijuana for medical use with the City of Oakland's knowledge and blessing.

Famed for his marijuana cultivation books and the "Ask Ed" column he wrote for High Times magazine, Rosenthal's 2003 conviction of three marijuana-growing felonies came more than a year after federal agents raided his Oakland home, an Oakland warehouse in which he was growing marijuana, and a San Francisco medical marijuana club he supplied.

Medical marijuana use on a doctor's recommendation is legal under state law but prohibited by federal law, so Rosenthal was barred from mounting a medical defense at trial.

Breyer sentenced him to one day behind bars -- time he'd already served.

The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals overturned his convictions in April 2006, finding juror misconduct -- a juror's conversation with an attorney-friend during deliberations -- compromised Rosenthal's right to a fair verdict and so warranted a new trial. But the court also rejected Rosenthal's claim of immunity from prosecution as an officer of Oakland who grew the drug under the city's medical marijuana ordinance.

Prosecutors re-indicted Rosenthal in October, adding charges that he'd laundered marijuana proceeds by buying four money orders totaling $1,854, and that he'd falsified tax returns for 1999, 2000 and 2001 by omitting income from his marijuana distribution. But Breyer in March tossed out those new charges, deeming them to be vindictive prosecution.

The government already has said it won't seek more than the one-day jail sentence Rosenthal served for his original conviction should he be convicted anew. Breyer has made it abundantly clear he'd like to see the case go away, suggesting the government should weigh whether its time and energy -- as well as his own -- is best spent on re-trying a man who already has served his sentence. Prosecutors chose to proceed anyway.

But if Breyer seemed testy with anyone Thursday, it was the defense. When attorney Shari Greenberger said she was "inclined" to withdraw part of a motion regarding evidence seized at the marijuana warehouse on Mandela Parkway, Breyer snapped, "This is not an encounter session" and urged the defense attorneys to make a decision.

Breyer rejected the defense's call for a hearing on whether the federal ban on marijuana is scientifically and medically appropriate, saying he doesn't have jurisdiction to do so. When the attorneys tried to argue it was a novel issue in a case like this, Breyer replied, "Listen, I'm a child of the '60s. ... This is not new to me."

Source: Daily Review, The (Hayward, CA)
Author: Josh Richman, Staff Writer
Published: May 10, 2007
Copyright: 2007 ANG Newspapers
Contact: http://tinyurl.com/283jhn
Website: http://www.insidebayarea.com/dailyreview

Related Articles & Web Site:

Ed Rosenthal's Pictures & Articles
http://freedomtoexhale.com/trialpics.htm

Rosenthal Asks Judge To Dismiss Charges
http://cannabisnews.com/news/thread22935.shtml

U.S. Says To Retry Ganja Guru Ed Rosenthal
http://cannabisnews.com/news/thread22868.shtml
 
Breyer rejected the defense's call for a hearing on whether the federal ban on marijuana is scientifically and medically appropriate, saying he doesn't have jurisdiction to do so. When the attorneys tried to argue it was a novel issue in a case like this, Breyer replied, "Listen, I'm a child of the '60s. ... This is not new to me."

Judge seems ok,

Dont think much of the prosecution though,

The government already has said it won't seek more than the one-day jail sentence Rosenthal served for his original conviction should he be convicted anew. Breyer has made it abundantly clear he'd like to see the case go away, suggesting the government should weigh whether its time and energy -- as well as his own -- is best spent on re-trying a man who already has served his sentence. Prosecutors chose to proceed anyway.

Anyone jailed for providing care to the sick, in whatever form helps them the most,

is the real crime,which is happening daily,by jailing innocent law abiding people,who grow a bit of pot for the sick,

I hope this madness stops soon,and a victimless 'crime',will have no victims.

The 'victims' who we know as the innocent home grower,farmer,providing medicine for the sick,

It gives the sick people relief from pain,and to be free of prescription pills,which do become addictive,and so they can have some quality of life ,which most of us take for granted.

It helps with cancer patients taking away nausea and helping with their appetite,people with aids,glucomea,it goes on.....

To deny this right to anyone,is like denying them the right to live,would these prosecutors be so keen if their health relied on mj,

we all know the answer to that one.
peace all.
 
Back
Top